Barack Obama: Eloquent but Empty

I promised a large Obama post, and here it is…

(As published in my school newspaper for March, 2008)

Presidential candidate Barack Obama is bar-none the most likeable candidate left in the race for President, but behind his lofty rhetoric, is there any substance?

As many Americans know by now, Illinois Senator Barack Obama was born in Hawaii and grew up in Indonesia. His father was from Kenya and his mother from Kansas. Later in life, he was a community organizer on the south side of Chicago. Then in 1997 he was elected to the Illinois State Senate. He served there until his 2004 U.S. Senate campaign. At that point, Obama was a little known figure but won the Democratic primary. His Republican challenger was thought to be Jack Ryan, who had a wide polling advantage. But in June of 2004, Ryan withdrew amid marital strife. This forced the Illinois GOP to replace Ryan in the middle of the election, fatally injuring the party’s chances in November.

Then, Obama delivered the Keynote address to the 2004 Democratic National Convention in Boston. It was a powerful, bipartisan speech which catapulted him onto the national scene. Obama went on to a landslide victory in the fall election and very early in his Senate career, supporters began mulling a higher office for Obama. After serving only 18 months in the U.S. Senate, Obama launched his Presidential bid.

So now that you know Barack Obama’s past, I ask you, does being a U.S. Senator for a year and a half qualify you to be Commander in Chief?

But then comes the question of what Barack Obama has done in his time as a public servant. That question is interesting because many of Obama’s supporters can’t even come up with an answer. For example, on MSNBC’s Hardball with Chris Mathews, an Obama surrogate was asked if he could name an accomplishment of Obama’s, he couldn’t even name one. On national television a politician who has endorsed this man for President, can’t name one thing that his candidate has done. I guess Obama’s theme of “change we can believe in” requires a lot of believing, because there isn’t much behind it.

I notice here at our school there are many Barack Obama supporters. When I ask some of them why they are supporting Obama, the most frequent response is that he speaks amazingly well. Well that’s all fine and good, but does that mean he should lead our country?

Other students even cite Obama’s race as a factor in their vote. Now wait a minute, are we really going to choose the next leader of the free world based on his race?

But let’s take a look at Obama’s rhetoric, though. One of his tried and true applause lines is to “bring the country together”. Again that sounds nice, but the truth is that Obama votes with his party more than 90 percent of the time. And the National Journal rated him the most liberal Senator in the U.S. Senate.

Obama uses inspirational words to describe his campaign for the Presidency: “hope”, “change”, “turning the page”, “change we can believe in”. But it seems that behind his broad speeches, there are little or no real solutions to America’s many problems. I’m sure people can point toward his website and his well thought out positions on every issue, but what makes any of us believe that he will be different than any other Presidential hopeful. Many of America’s problems date back decades, and in those decades we’ve had Presidents that have had a lot more experience than Barack Obama. Obama’s powerful speeches promise to not only change the country, but to “change the world”. But he knows full well that he cannot deliver on all of those lofty promises, his record is as thin as it is partisan.

My point is this, let’s not get duped by a man promising the world in return for our votes. Let’s try to look beyond Barack Obama’s infectious style and bring him down to earth in our minds. Let us not forget the old adage to not to judge a book by its cover, even if that cover looks and sounds eloquent, because in the end, it may be empty.

Advertisements

4 Comments

Filed under Barack Obama

4 responses to “Barack Obama: Eloquent but Empty

  1. Willanita

    All I can say is I agree. You wrote a great piece for the school paper. What kind of feedback have you received? Hopefully, you’ve made a few Obama fans think about what they believe in.

  2. Karin

    John McCain-
    Basically another Bush. At the very least, another Republican.

    Hilary Clinton-
    A very petty woman who whines about her opponents, or the press, of sexism, etc. ervy other day. Not self-respecting enough to leave her husband when the ENTIRE country knows he cheated on her. Attempted to solve the healthcare problem when her husband was in office (the only thing she was in charge of) and failed miserably. (If she can’t solve one issue, how is she going to lead the country?)

    Barack Obama-
    He has the potential to soar, and he has the potential to crash. Even if his speeches are all empty promises, the fact that he can inspire so many people to get out and vote, can bring so many people to his rallies, can get voters from all parties on his side; just the fact that Americans are showing far more enthusiasm about their future that they have in decades, is enough to put him before the other candidates in my opinion.

    And that is why I am voting for Obama. Anyone who votes based on race, gender, religion, etc, is an idiot.

  3. Sphynx

    I see you’re one of those people that doesn’t do research before writing, just basically re-writes what others have written without finding out how accurate their statements were.

    Suggestion 1: Read Audacity of Hope.

    Suggestion 2: Name your 5 favorite presidents, then look at their history and see if Obama is less qualified than they were.

    Suggestion 3: Spend time on his website and contemplate why he has the ‘Educated’ demograph.

    Suggestion 4: http://thomas.loc.gov Look at what he’s really done, not via a biased website, but through pure research.

    The only things you’ve stated here is that he’s full of empty promises. His promise of ‘change’, which according to thomas.loc.gov, he’s had more success pushing ‘change’ legislation through the Senate than almost anyone.

    That he can’t “change the world”, despite his book, Audacity of Hope showing some pretty clear cut methods to do just that, and in our ‘Information Age’, people -should- be thinking globally, not just nationally.

    No harm in having your own opinion on things, after all, you may be right, he may be an empty suit. All talk. But that could be true of any of the candidates (or do you have on in specific that we should just believe?). So, choosing the candidate that shows his actions has met his words to-date, is the only option we have. That cuts Clinton right out, leaving only a war mongering 3rd term Bush, or a Hope for Change.

    Guess where my vote goes.

  4. The Young Conservative

    To Sphynx:

    1. Top Five Presidents…
    *Reagan-Gov. for 8 years (More than Obama)
    *FDR- Asst. Sec. Navy for 7 years, Gov. for 3 years (Overall, more than Obama)
    *Teddy R-Asst. Sec. Navy one year, Gov. for two years, VP for a year +Spanish-American war service (Overall, more Obama)
    *Lincoln- The only exception. (House for 2 years)
    *Washington-8 years as General for Continental Army (More than Obama)

    So, 4 of my 5 have more experience than Obama.

    Next, a challenge for you…Without looking on your website, name a bill Obama has PASSED. Key word, PASSED. I looked on your website and almost all the “bills” he’s sponsored have been referred to a committee, not passed. He has passed some amendments, but those aren’t bills. I’ve seen 5 resolutions he’s authored and gotten passed.

    (Here are some for your viewing pleasure…)

    http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c110:S.CON.RES.25:

    http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c110:S.RES.133:

    http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c110:S.RES.268:

    http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c109:S.RES.291:

    http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c109:S.RES.516:

    http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c109:S.2125:

    Also, with all due respect, it’s a little naive to think that one man can change the world and he hasn’t even been elected yet. Who knows, he may get elected twice and be the best President ever, but now, he’s not the messianic figure many, including you, portray him as.

    I also would disagree with the John McCain is a “war mongering 3rd term Bush.” I may have to write a post on that.

    Thanks for commenting.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s